Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.U.K

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ 04:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M.U.K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been unsourced and blatantly promotional since at least 2013, but on top of that, this person doesn't seem to pass WP:ARTIST, although I'm not entirely sure. The magazine article in the external link section could be significant coverage (but it's unclear to me whether this magazine itself is in any way notable) and I can't find anything else online. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.